目前,大部分科技期刊论文评审方式实行同行评议,稿件的学术质量主要由审稿专家把关。在具体编辑实践中发现,审稿专家在稿件的科学性控制方面还不够,编辑应有所作为。文章结合自己的工作实际,分析了审稿专家容易疏忽而需要编辑在稿件评审、退修、加工及清样审读过程中注意的科学性问题。并就编辑科学素养的培养和提升提出了几点建议。 At present, most of the sci-tech periodicals peer reviewers review papers, the academic quality of manuscripts mainly by reviewers. In the specific editing practice, it is found that reviewers are not enough to control the scientific aspects of manuscripts and editors should do something. Based on the actual work of the author, the article analyzes the scientific problems that the reviewers are easy to neglect and need to pay attention to in editing, reviewing, processing and sampling of the manuscripts. And put forward some suggestions on the cultivation and promotion of editing scientific literacy.