论文部分内容阅读
自从里根于1983年3月23日向全国发表电视演说以来,他的战略防御倡义(SDI)已在大西洋两岸赞同派和反对派之间引起了热烈的辩论,辩论的中心问题是关于这种防御系统的价值和技术可行性。 作为外行,我们认为,无论是直接同SDI机构搞合作,还是搞独立的欧洲防御倡议(EDI),都能产生实际的效果。这些计划不但能防御近程和中程的弹道导弹,而且能加强欧洲的常规防御力量。 本文首先回顾一下弹道导弹防御(BMD)的基本目的,然后研究苏联对欧洲的特殊威胁,欧洲战略防御系统可能是个什么样以及可能采用的武器技术。最后讨论与核威胁无直接关系的在防御策略方面可能带来的好处。
Since Reagan’s televised address nationwide on March 23, 1983, his Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) has generated a heated debate between pro-opposition and opposition parties on the Atlantic. The central issue in the debate was about such defenses The value of the system and technical feasibility. As a layman, we think that both directly engaging with the SDI agencies and implementing the independent European Defense Initiative (EDI) can produce concrete results. These plans not only defensive short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles, but also to strengthen Europe’s conventional defensive forces. This article begins by reviewing the basic purpose of Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) and then examining the special Soviet threat to Europe and what the European strategic defense system may be and what weapons are likely to be used. Finally, discuss the possible benefits of defensive tactics that are not directly related to nuclear threats.