论文部分内容阅读
周群认为,文学之士在思想史上的作用是思想史研究中有待开掘的一个领域。文学之士的思想创制较儒士灵活自由,对个性解放思潮具有重要的推动作用,其“荡越”思想也容易引起传统势力的诟病使其所信奉的思潮而很快消减;他们的思想贡献因文名所掩,常常被忽略。颜世安尝试从历史角度来研究古代人文思想的“超越性”取向,具体则落在春秋前中期的诸夏认同和华夷之辨这一“点”上,由此方可显现《论语》中孔子与弟子对话的观念背景。方旭东认为,思想史边界之所以成为一个问题,与思想史这门学科的特殊性不无关系。这种特殊性,使人对思想史的合法性产生怀疑。因此,思想史只有将人类历史上对时代精神课题作出归纳并试图作出解答的富有启发意义的思考作为自己的研究对象,它作为一门独立的学科才可以成立。
Zhou Qun believes that the role of literary persons in the history of ideas is an area to be explored in the study of history of ideas. Literati’s thought creation is more flexible and flexible than Confucianism, and plays an important role in pushing forward the trend of liberation of personality. His thoughts of “swinging over” can easily arouse the criticism of traditional forces to quickly reduce the trend he believes in. Contributions to ideas due to the name of the text, often overlooked. Yan Shian tried to study the “transcendence” orientation of ancient humane thoughts from the historical point of view, specifically falling into the “dot” of the early summer and the early mid-summer, The Conceptual Background of the Dialogue between Confucius and Disciples in The Analects of Confucius. Fang Xudong believes that the reason why the boundary of the history of thought has become a problem is not unrelated to the particularity of the discipline of intellectual history. This particularity casts doubt on the legitimacy of the history of ideas. Therefore, the thought history can only be established as an independent subject only by enlightening the enlightening thinking of inducing and attempting to answer the questions of the time in human history.