加工食品之争

来源 :英语学习 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:lz3163
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  “Eat real food” is simple-seeming dietary advice that’s actually anything but.2 On the one hand, it sounds easy enough: It’s a guideline that appears to leave room for most food groups.3 On the other hand, though, “real food” is a slippery4 concept, one without any single established definition. And without a universal understanding of what the term describes, many people just use “real food” to mean the opposite of“processed food”—a dichotomy that doesn’t do anybody any favors.5
  That’s because most of us don’t have a clear understanding of what “processed food” means, either. Many foods we like to think of as “whole” and “natural” undergo a fair amount of processing. As food scientist Robert Shewfelt explains, baby carrots have to be de-leaved, washed, disinfected with chlorine, chilled, cut, peeled,6 and polished prior to bagging. Bagged salads are shredded7 and triple washed, also with chlorine. Most milk in the U.S. is fortified, homogenized, and pasteurized, and that’s a good thing, as pasteurization greatly reduces the risk of foodborne illness.8 Some crops, like leafy greens, are more susceptible to pathogens,9 and processing helps get them clean. Freezing, a form of processing, can preserve nutrients, whereas fresh fruits and vegetables begin to lose those nutrients under all sorts of conditions, including exposure to heat, rough handling, and refrigeration.10
  And while “processed food” may sound like a modernday invention, nothing could be farther from the truth.11 The history of processed food actually begins 1.8 million years ago, when our ancestors began roasting meat; two later examples are bread and beer.

  Katherine Pett, a registered dietician, finds the term“processed food” far too nebulous.12 “Various experts who promote different ways of eating or their own food products [all] have different definitions of what constitutes processed food,” she says. The category definitely includes chips, crackers, and cookies, but it also includes things like canned tomatoes, dried pasta, and hummus.13
  In his book In Defense of Processed Food, Robert Shewfelt defines processed food as “a product that has been modified to improve its safety, extend the shelf life, enhance its quality, and improve its convenience.”14 Processing can also open up our diets to healthy foods that might otherwise be too time-consuming or difficult to make: Beans, for example, require overnight soaking and hours of cooking, unless they’re the canned, processed kind you find on grocery-store shelves (as Pett explains, “buying a can of beans is a good and easy way to introduce beneficial legumes”).15 The advent of bagged lettuce,16 meanwhile, likely led to an increase in our consumption of healthy leafy greens.   Unprocessed food, then, isn’t necessarily better. And as food historian Rachel Laudan notes in her essay “A Plea for Culinary Modernism,” processing can improve the flavor of healthy foods, too: “For our ancestors, natural was something quite nasty.17 Natural often tasted bad,” she writes. “Fresh meat was rank and tough, fresh milk warm and unmistakably a bodily excretion; fresh fruits (dates and grapes being rare exceptions outside the tropics) were inedibly sour, fresh vegetables bitter.”18
  But what about the chemicals? You might be thinking. Well, technically, everything is a chemical. And organic pop tarts and non-GMO chips aren’t any healthier, or less processed, than those made by Kellogg’s or Lay’s.19 Weighing the health risk of certain ingredients, it’s important to remember that old maxim: The dose makes the poison.20 Most preservatives, additives, and other chemicals in our food are present only in trace amounts that aren’t dangerous or unhealthy.21
  In part, our suspicion of processed foods is about nostalgia22, too. The newold trend of pickling and home canning, for example, doesn’t make the end result any healthier just because the processing happens in your kitchen.23 And while we tend to feel better about homemade cookies and cakes, they usually aren’t any healthier than storebought, “processed” cookies; their advantage comes from the fact that they connect us to familial24 and cultural traditions.
  It’s worth noting, though, that this nostalgia isn’t harmless: “While family meals of wholesome, home-cooked foods are increasingly romanticized,”as environmental historian Jennifer Bernstein wrote,“it’s likely that they are romanticized by those on the receiving end of those meals.” And as Shewfelt has noted, “shelf stable foods25, the development of ready-to-eat products, and use of microwave ovens dramatically decreased food preparation times which may have contributed to the entry of more women to the workforce.”
  1. bad rap: 壞名声。
  2. “吃真食物”看起来只是简单的饮食建议,但实则不然。dietary: 饮食的;anything but: 绝不是,毫不。
  3. 一方面,这一建议听起来简单易行,因为它似乎给大多数食物都留有余地。
  4. slippery: 不明确的。
  5. 对于“真正的食物”没有一个统一的理解,人们就用它来指称加工食品以外的食物——然而,这一二分法却没有起到任何作用。dichotomy:二分法。
  6. de-leaf: 脱叶;disinfect: 消毒;chlorine: 氯;chill: 冷冻,冷藏;peel:去皮。
  7. shred: 切碎。
  8. fortify: 加入维生素、矿物质等以提高食品的营养价值;homogenize:使牛奶中的油脂粒均匀分布;pasteurize:用巴氏消毒法对牛奶、啤酒等消毒灭菌;pasteurization: 巴氏消毒法,在某一控制温度下给液体食物或饮料加热以提高保藏质量,杀死有害的微生物;foodborne illness: 食源性疾病。   9. leafy greens: 绿叶菜;susceptible: 易受感染的;pathogen: 病原体,病菌。
  10. nutrient: 营养物质;refrigeration: 冷藏。
  11. 尽管“加工食品”听起来像是现代的发明,真相却远非如此。
  12. dietician: 营养师;nebulous: 含糊的。
  13. cracker: 薄脆饼干;canned tomatoes: 罐装番茄;hummus:鷹嘴豆泥,把鹰嘴豆捣碎后加麻油、大蒜、欧芹等配制成的冷食,为中东等国家的开胃食品。
  14. In Defense of Processed Food :《为加工食品辩护》,在本书中,作者将加工食品定义为“那些经过加工改造,改善其安全性,延长保质期,提升便捷性的产品”;shelf life: 保质期。
  15. 食品加工也让我们能吃到更多健康食物,因为如果不经过加工的话,这些食物烹饪起来费时又费力。比如说,除非是超市货架上罐装的、加工好的豆子,未加工的豆子要泡一整晚,再煮上几个小时才能食用(正如佩特所说,吃罐装豆子能够简单又便捷地获取对人体有益的豆科植物)。legume: 豆类,豆科植物。
  16. advent: 出现;lettuce: 生菜。
  17. “A Plea for Culinary Modernism”:《呼吁烹饪现代主义》,在本文中,作者提出对于天然和纯手工食品的痴迷早已过时,我们应该追求更高质量的工业食品;nasty: 难吃的。
  18. rank: 恶臭的;excretion: 排泄物,分泌物;date: 椰枣,海枣;inedibly: 不可食用地。

  19. organic: 有机的;pop tart: 一种上面有果酱或果馅的小圆饼;GMO: 转基因生物,全称genetically modified organism;Kellogg’s: 美国家乐氏公司,在全世界出售各种谷类早餐;Lay’s: 美国薯片品牌。
  20. ingredient: 原料,成分;maxim: 准则;The dose makes the poison: 剂量决定毒性。这是毒理学的重要信条,即所有物质都有一定毒性,必须基于使用的剂量来讨论才有意义。
  21. preservative: 防腐剂;additive: 添加剂;trace amount: 痕量,微量,指化学上极微小的量,微小到只有一点儿痕迹。
  22. nostalgia: 怀旧。
  23. 比如说,当下流行但由来已久的食物腌制和罐头自制,不会因为是在自家厨房里加工的而就更加健康。pickle:腌制;home canning: 家庭自制罐头。
  24. familial: 家庭的。
  25. shelf stable food: 耐贮存食品。
其他文献
How do we learn the things we do in life, like greeting someone we know or someone we’re meeting for the first time?  In France, a typical greeting among adults is a kiss on both cheeks, whether with
2018年2月12日,笔者去爬岳麓山,结识了几位湖南大学的非洲留学生。笔者倒是想与他们用英语交流,可他们却坚持用汉语与我交流,偶尔还飚出长沙方言。更令人意外的是,其中一位甚至问我“三个女人一台戏(Something is bound to happen when several women get together)”是什么意思,我当时不知所措,一时半会儿还真回答不上来。  的确,随着中国倡导的“
Why That One Diet Trick Won’t Work1  “你的人生被你的肥肉毁掉了!”“要么瘦,要么死!”……现在这个社会,仿佛一旦你瘦成一道闪电,男朋友、好工作、高薪酬都会随之而来,所以“我要减肥”成了很多人的口头禅。为了减肥你都尝试过哪些方法呢?节食、运动,还是吃减肥药?那么结果呢?  1. diet: 节食;trick: 诀窍。  2. magic bullet: 妙招。 
隨着物质生活的丰富,人们对食物的需求从“吃饱”转变成了“吃好”。越来越多食物的选择和健康意识的提高让人们的饮食习惯发生了很大改变。在大洋彼岸的美国,人们是怎样通过饮食改善自己健康状况的呢?这些听上去有些不可思议的饮食法,真的有效果吗?  Americans are obsessed with food and diets. This has long held true, and I have c
What Sherlock Holmes Taught Us About the Mind  福尔摩斯系列小说是人们闲暇时极好的消遣读物,但如今它们竟然出现在医学教授列给学生的专业书单中。这究竟是怎么回事呢?相信大家都曾被这位小说中杜撰的天才侦探在破案时所展现出来的细致观察力和严密的逻辑推理力所折服,是的,这便是医学院的学生们要学习的内容。医院就如犯罪现场,我们需要精密的头脑和理性思维来为病人诊断
天生体力狂  第一次出远门是去丰宁坝上骑马,当时我们十来个朋友一起租个面包车,啤酒那个时候应该还不到一岁,还是只小狗。我就记得那时候它还不太习惯坐车,它和我的朋友一人一狗一起晕车。当时路况还不大好,很颠簸,两家伙坐在最后一排,头随着车一起摇晃,频率都是一样的,脸色也都是一样的……  不过,等到了地方以后啤酒恢复过来,才发现边牧跑得可真快,我骑着四轮摩托,时速足有六七十公里,它居然还能跟着跑好久。 
一词一立场  大家最耳熟能详的中国传统翻译原则莫过于严复提出的“信、达、雅”三字。“信”字历来被认为是三原则之首,作为评判翻译质量的首要标准。然而,也有不少翻译研究者通过研究历史上实际发生的翻译活动发现,要做到绝对的“信”几乎是不可能的,而且绝对的“信”并不一定能带来最佳的翻译效果,甚至会造成反效果。  翻译中“信”对译者在翻译中采用的立场提出了严格要求。但在实际翻译活动中,译者经常会发现自己处在
我叫哈希·扎西多杰,今年58岁,是一个黑不溜秋、皱皱巴巴的老人。有大学生叫我扎多大哥,这个称呼我比较喜欢,年龄奔六,我的心却特别年轻。  好像有一种骨子里与生俱来的东西,我不现实,总是去做梦,总会遇到同行的人。从教育改革到民间环保,我总想要改变一些什么。到现在也一样,要是没有梦的话,我就活不下去。  我曾经作为秘书跟随杰桑·索南达杰,两年间12次进入可可西里。1994年1月,索南达杰被藏羚羊盗猎分
心智健全的。
期刊
Once one of the best in the world, Scotland’s education system has been steadily marching backwards for the past 10 years. From the outside, it seems baffling: why, given that Scottish spending per pu