早在16世纪,艺术圈内就出现过对不同媒介材质(主要是绘画和雕塑)究竟孰轻孰重、优劣高低的争论。达·芬奇认为绘画胜过雕塑。他解释说,理性的色彩或绘画可以如实地由色彩在不同造型、体积上进行描绘,这比雕塑的效果更好。而米开朗基罗没有直接回答绘画和雕塑间的优劣高下问题,他仅是委婉地指出绘画和雕塑实为同一事物的两个方面。也就是说雕塑和绘画是在表现事物的不同侧面,表述的母题其实是一致的。我认为,米开朗基罗是对的,或者说,他对不同绘画材质的 As early as the 16th century, the controversy over the merits of different media materials (mainly paintings and sculptures) and their merits and demerits has appeared in the art circle. Leonardo da Vinci considered painting better than sculpture. He explained that the rational color or painting can be accurately described by color in different shapes and volumes, which is better than the sculpture. However, Michelangelo did not directly answer the question of the pros and cons between painting and sculpture. He only euphemistically pointed out that painting and sculpture are actually two aspects of the same thing. In other words, sculptures and paintings represent different aspects of things, and the motif of the expression is actually the same. I think Michelangelo is right, or that he has different materials for painting