论文部分内容阅读
现代派对柯尔律治、艾略特、瑞恰慈的知性理论作了广泛介绍与阐发。柯尔律治的智力调谐理论演变为艾略特诗是经验、避却抒情、非个人化的客观理性的理论;演变为瑞恰慈的强调诗对经验中的兴趣、思想中的对立因素的平衡、组织、管理、有序的能力。叶公超诗学是对艾略特、瑞恰慈知性理论的中国化:提倡“扩大错综的知觉”,提倡“古今错综的意识”,比较艾略特传统论与宋诗“夺胎换骨”说。金克木以知性理论评论中国新诗,具有实践的品格。知性理论对卞之琳创作发生了根本变革。卞之琳转向知性的实践使其与转向超现实主义的戴望舒形成了鲜明分界,构成了现代派前后期的分界。
The modernists made extensive introduction and elucidation of the theory of intellectual property of Coleridge, Eliot and Ruichaci. Coleridge’s theory of intellectual tuning evolved into the theory that Eliot’s poetry is an experience that avoids lyrical and non-personal objective rationality; it evolves into Riccière’s emphasis on the interest in experience and the antinomy in thought Balance, organization, management, orderly ability. Ye Gongchao’s poetics is the Chinese localization of Eliot’s and Ruichao’s theory of knowledge: advocating “enlarging the consciousness of intricacy” and advocating “the ancient and modern intricacy consciousness”, comparing the traditional theory of Eliot with the theory of “reincarnation” in Song Dynasty . Jin Kemu comments on Chinese new poetry with intellectual theory, with practical character. Intellectualism has undergone fundamental changes to Bian Zhilin’s creation. Bian Zhilin turned to intellectual practice and turned it into a sharp dividing line with Dai Wangshu, who turned to surrealism, which formed the dividing line between the front and the back of modernism.