论文部分内容阅读
当儒学成为中国的统治思想之后,历史上每次变法与改革,都必须先在儒学学理上找到根据。康有为等人发动的维新变法,就是以儒家的春秋公羊学为理论根据的,他以《春秋繁露》为依托,编著《新学伪经考》、《孔子改制考》、《春秋董氏学》等书,系统论述他的政治改革思想。然而同在晚清公羊学发展的学脉之中,苏舆却对康有为的理论进行了针锋相对的批判。他编辑《翼教丛编》,撰著《春秋繁露义证》,正是晚清学术界“维新”与“翼教”两派之间思想斗争的反映。值得注意的是,两派之间既有冲突的一面,也有融合的一面,这是由晚清学术与政治复杂的互动关系所决定的。
After Confucianism became the dominant thought of China, every time in the history of reform and reform, we must first find the basis for Confucianism. Kang Youwei and others launched a reform and change method, that is, based on the theory of Confucianism in the Spring and Autumn Mahjong theory. He relied on the “Chunqiu Fanlu” and compiled the “New Study of the Confucian Classics”, “Confucius Restructuring”, “Spring and Autumn Dong Learning ”and other books, systematically discusses his political reform ideas. However, in the same vein as the development of the Ram in the late Qing Dynasty, Su Yu criticized Kang Youwei’s theory in a diametrically opposed manner. His compilation of “Wings Education Series” and his compilation of “Spring, Autumn and Miscellaneous Worship,” is a reflection of the ideological struggles between the two schools in late Qing academic circles such as “Reform” and “Wing Buddhism.” It is noteworthy that there are both conflicting and converging aspects between the two factions, which is determined by the complex interactive relationship between academic and political developments in the late Qing dynasty.