论文部分内容阅读
咱们国人对“影响”一词似乎有特殊的偏好。每每遇到紧要关头之处、背水一战之地,抑或理屈词穷之时,掷出“影响”云云,总会落地铮铮有声,颇多奇效。比如,黎民告官,若对手为公安老大,纵然十二分有理,振振有词,然屡屡较量,却总是屡屡败北。某地受理10件告公安的治安纠纷,件件以黎民败诉而告终,大盖帽者曰:“要注意公安的形象和影响。”此言极“是”,可谓冠冕堂皇,光彩夺目。再如,书生们舞文弄墨,涉及官僚们明争暗斗之内幕,抑或私有制、
Our people seem to have a special preference for the word “influence.” Often encounter critical junctures, the land of the world, or when the words of the financiers throwing “influence” and so on, always landing clank sound, a lot more miraculous. For example, Lebanon sue the officer, if the opponent is the boss of the public security, even if the second is rational, plausible, but often repeated contest, but always repeatedly defeated. A place to accept 10 public order and public order disputes, the pieces to the people lost the final, the big cap said: “The publicity to pay attention to the image and impact.” The remark is “very”, indeed sounding, dazzling. Another example is that scholar-dramas, involving bureaucrats infighting secret inside, or private ownership,