行政自由裁量权是行政主体在外在法治与内在伦理精神的指引下,以追求公共利益最大化为目标,对行政主体一种积极限制和积极自由的统一。这种定位因行政理性的限度,“委托—代理”双方信息不对称致使权力寻租现象出现和相机抉择的时滞作用等原因而出现错位。而通过强化信息素养、厘清权力边界进而压缩寻租空间,建设责任、效能政府等方面入手,为自由裁量权的复位提供合法性前提。 Administrative discretion is the main body of the administrative body under the guidance of the rule of law and internal ethics, the pursuit of the maximization of the public interest as the goal, an active limit on the administrative body and positive and free unity. This positioning due to the limits of administrative rationality, “entrust - agent ” asymmetric information led to the phenomenon of rent-seeking power and the camera’s decision-making delay and other reasons there is dislocation. However, by strengthening information literacy, clarifying the boundary of power and thus reducing the space for rent-seeking, the responsibility of construction and the government of efficiency, it provides the legal premise for the reset of discretion.