论文部分内容阅读
近年来,随着法理学研究领域对“能动司法”、“司法能动”、“司法能动主义”等问题的深入研讨,一些学者也开始在刑事司法领域倡导能动主义,并引起了一些争论。笔者认为,在刑事司法领域倡导能动主义,既超越了我国目前的法治发展阶段,同时更忽略了刑事司法活动的特殊性。如果将之施行于刑事司法实践,必将严重阻碍我国刑事法治建设的进程。因此,刑事司法活动必须坚持司法克制主义的基本立场。
In recent years, along with the in-depth discussions on the issues of “active judicial ”, “judicial active ” and “judicial activism ” in the field of jurisprudence research, some scholars also started to advocate the initiative in the field of criminal justice and Aroused some controversy. The author believes that advocating activism in the field of criminal justice not only surmounts the current stage of development of the rule of law in our country, but also ignores the particularity of criminal justice activities. If implemented in the criminal justice practice, it will seriously hamper the process of the construction of criminal law in our country. Therefore, criminal justice activities must adhere to the basic position of judicial restraint.