能否从“是”中推出“应该”的休谟难题一直备受争议,从价值认识论的角度对其分析,将“是”和“应该”各自作“科学认识”和“价值认识”的二分,我们发现:从价值事实的“是”中,推不出科学规律的“应该”来,或从价值的“应该”中,推不出科学的“是”来。而科学发展观是价值需求与科学规律的统一。任何以价值需求凌驾于科学规律之上都是违背科学发展观的,在现实生活中极易造成浮躁心态和急功近利行为。 Whether or not Hume’s problem can be deduced from “yes ” has always been the subject of controversy. From the perspective of value epistemology, the Hume puzzle can be divided into two parts: “yes ” and “should ” “And ” value “ ’s dichotomy, we found that from the fact of value ” is “, can not push the scientific law ” should “, or from the value of ” should Can not push the scientific “yes ” to. The scientific concept of development is the unity of value and scientific laws. Any value demand above the scientific laws is against the scientific concept of development, in real life can easily lead to impetuous mind and quick success.