当犯罪嫌疑人不回答或回答的内容不符合侦查人员心目中的标准时,就认为犯罪嫌疑人在抵赖,于是为获取口供侦查人员难免会动手或者动用具械,刑讯逼供就这样发生了。对犯罪嫌疑人进行刑讯逼供,这不但有违人道主义精神,更严重的是它将动摇法律赖以存在的规范性基础,使人们对国家的权威产生动摇。一个根据刑讯逼供而获得的证据所作出的裁判结果,以违法治违法,即使结果符合客观真实,可以说,结果的正义是不能代替法律的公正的。 When the suspects do not answer or answer the content does not meet the standards of the investigators in mind, they think the suspects denied, so in order to obtain the mouthpiece of the investigators will inevitably be hands-on or use of equipment, torture took place this way. Extorting a confession by torture not only violates the spirit of humanitarianism, but more seriously, it will shake the normative foundation upon which law exists and cause people to waver over the authority of the state. Even if the result is in conformity with the objective reality, it can be said that the resulting justice can not replace the impartiality of the law, as a result of the refereeing made by evidence obtained by torture.