论文部分内容阅读
本文以《老乞大谚解》和《朴通事谚解》中的疑问代词为研究对象,在详尽统计与描写两书疑问代词使用情况的基础上,分析比较二者在疑问代词使用上的异同。通过研究我们发现:两书在疑问代词的使用上没有明显的差异,疑问代词的使用都比较丰富,各类疑问代词语义明确,可用于不同句式;高频疑问代词基本一致,但使用频率有所不同;相同语义,两书所用的疑问代词也不尽相同。
Based on the detailed statistics and depiction of the use of interrogative pronouns in the two books, the thesis analyzes and compares the use of interrogative pronouns between the two Similarities and differences. Through the research we found that there is no obvious difference between the two pronouns, the use of interrogative pronouns are more abundant, the interrogative pronouns have clear semantics and can be used in different sentence patterns. The interrogative pronouns in high frequency are basically the same, but the frequency of use is Different; the same semantic, interrogative pronouns used in the two books are not the same.