论文部分内容阅读
我国法律关于隐名股东规定的缺失以为现实中大量隐名股东要求显名的诉讼缺乏裁判的依据。提起显名之诉为隐名股东的权利救济提供了途径,但因显名涉及其他股东、公司及第三人的利益,应对隐名股东显名诉请加以严格限定。作者认为,只有具备不违反法律规定、实际出资、公司及过半数股东认可、有显名之必要以及诉请明确等条件,隐名股东的显名诉请才能得到支持。
China’s law on the lack of hidden shareholders that the reality of a large number of anonymous shareholders to claim the lack of legal basis for judgments. The plaintiff’s appeal provided the way for the remedy of the hidden shareholders’ rights. However, the plaintiff’s name appeal should be strictly limited in the interests of other shareholders, the company and the third party because of its apparent name. The author believes that only with the non-violating the law, the actual capital contribution, the company and the majority of shareholders recognized, the need for a clear name and the plaintiffs to clarify such conditions, the unnamed shareholder’s apparent appeal can be supported.