论文部分内容阅读
台湾学者周明德先生的《天气对“澎湖癸亥海战”之影响》(下简称周文)一文,利用一些史籍中关于当时气候的记载,对清初福建水师提督施琅选择于康熙二十二年(癸亥年,1683年)六月进攻澎湖的缘由、澎湖海战时气候的变化及其它有关问题作了探讨.周文在台湾史学界似影响较大,有的台湾学者甚至认为,离开周文就无法对清、郑双方在澎湖的海战作深入的研究.然而,笔者细读周文,却发现它存在着许多谬误,它所提出的有关观点也是缺乏根据的,下面即逐一列举,并加以分析,以澄清事实.
Taiwan scholar Mr. Zhou Mingde’s “The Impact of Weather on the Battle of Gui Hai in Penghu” (hereinafter referred to as Zhou Wen), using some historical records about the climate at that time, in the early Qing Dynasty, Nirvana Shi Lang Lang chose twenty-two years (Gui Niannian, 1683), the causes of the offensive in Penghu in June, the climate change during the naval battle in Penghu, and other related issues.Zhou Wen has a greater influence on the history of Taiwan, and some scholars in Taiwan even think that it is impossible to leave Zhouwen Qing and Zheng both conducted an in-depth study of the sea battle in Penghu.However, when I read through Zhou Wen, I found that there were many fallacies. The relevant opinions it made were also unfounded. The following are listed one by one and analyzed to clarify fact.