论文部分内容阅读
民主的危机这一悲观论题来自 60年代的民主浪潮。罗尔斯提出了公平正义论 ,为变革设计了一幅蓝图。诺齐克以权制正义论对抗 ,否定之。二人之争的实质是 ,解决社会公平问题应选择什么样的社会发展战略 ,是公平优先 ,还是效率优先。二人之争也启发我们 ,中国经历了 2 2年的改革开放 ,社会公平问题已凸现出来。政府必须以公平为价值取向进行政策调整 ,严惩腐败以治本。解决公平问题不是返回到传统的平均主义 ,而是达到恰当的公平
The pessimistic issue of the crisis of democracy comes from the wave of democracy in the 1960s. Rawls put forward the theory of fairness and justice and designed a blueprint for change. Nozick confrontation with the theory of the power of justice, negative. The essence of the dispute between the two is that what kind of social development strategy should be chosen to solve the problem of social fairness be fair or prioritized or efficiency first? The dispute between the two also inspired us. China has experienced 22 years of reform and opening up. The problem of social fairness has been highlighted. The government must make policy adjustments based on fairness and value and severely punish corruption for its permanent cure. The solution to the issue of equity is not to return to traditional egalitarianism but to achieve just equity