论文部分内容阅读
刑法的宽容应当关注司法的宽容。然而目前学界主张的刑法宽容的道德、哲学、犯罪学、人类发展趋势等依据,既不能为司法定罪量刑提供明确的标准,也不能解决宽容的普遍性与特殊性问题,所以不能作为司法宽容的主要依据,其至多在自由裁量的自由心证中有一席之地。相反,刑法中的主观主义、预防主义以及宽容相济刑事政策恰恰能够解决以上问题,因而是刑法宽容的主要依据。另外,应当注意有无被害人犯罪的差异,有被害人犯罪中被害人的宽容和被害人过错是宽容的依据,而无被害人犯罪的性质决定应当对其从宽处理。
The tolerance of criminal law should pay attention to judicial tolerance. However, based on the morality, philosophy, criminology and human development trend advocated by the scholars in the criminal law at present, it can neither provide a clear standard for sentencing of sentencing nor solve the universality and particularity of tolerance, and therefore can not be used as judicial tolerance The main basis, at the very least, lies in the discretion of free testimony. On the contrary, the criminal law’s subjectivism, preventiveism and the criminal policy of tolerance and incompetence can solve the above problems and thus are the main basis for the tolerance of criminal law. In addition, attention should be paid to whether there is any difference between the victim’s crime, the victim’s tolerance and the victim’s fault in the victim’s crime are the basis of tolerance, while the nature of the victimless crime should be treated leniently.