论文部分内容阅读
目的:从文献计量学角度分析肥胖与糖尿病在专业发展上的异同。方法:在中国知识基础设施工程（China National Knowledge Infrastructure，CNKI）数据库和万方知识服务平台上检索、收集肥胖与糖尿病领域指南及专家共识相关文献，并从文献计量学的角度分析文献发表趋势、指南及共识地域分布情况、引用次数分布情况。结果:肥胖指南及共识的研究起步时间晚于糖尿病领域；肥胖指南及共识相关研究尚处在萌芽阶段，而糖尿病领域已进入成熟期；在这两个领域中美国相应指南和共识一直最受关注；肥胖领域代表性指南总被引次数远低于糖尿病领域代表性指南（3 479比11 678次）。结论:肥胖作为一种慢性病，目前在我国的专业学科发展方面远不如糖尿病专业。“,”Objective:To analyze the similarities and differences between obesity and diabetes in discipline development from the perspective of bibliometrics.Methods:Relevant literatures of guidelines and expert consensus in the field of obesity and diabetes were retrieved and collected from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Knowledge Service Platform. The literature publication trend, the country and region distribution of guideline and consensus, as well as the distribution of citation frequency were further analyzed from the perspective of bibliometrics.Results:The research of guidelines and consensus of obesity started later than the diabetes. Its related research was still in its infancy, while the field of diabetes was in its mature stage. The corresponding guidelines and expert consensus in the United States were the major concerns in whatever fields of obesity or diabetes. The total number of citations for representative guidelines in the field of obesity was much lower than the representative guidelines in the field of diabetes （3 479 n vs. 11 678）.n Conclusion:As a type of chronic disease, the obesity shows far inferior to diabetes in the development of professional disciplines in China.