论文部分内容阅读
刑法学界关于刑法解释限度的学说混淆了刑法解释限度的理论、标准及其逻辑分析工具,将其一概作为刑法解释限度进行论证,是不科学的。实质上,预测可能性说只是刑法解释限度的原则根据和理论支撑,犯罪定型——事物本质说才是刑法解释的限度,而法文语义说则是刑法解释限度的逻辑分析工具。结合我国构成要件的实际,犯罪定型应作如下修正:犯罪定型属规范性类型,应当进行实质判断,属实质类型。对犯罪定型的把握,应从事物的本质出发进行论证。事物本质的考察,犯罪定型的把握,来源于在法律意旨、意义关系同质性的寻求前提下,演绎与归纳等置模式的推论。
The theory of criminal law jurisprudence on the interpretation of the limits of criminal law confused the limits of criminal law interpretation of the theory, standards and logic analysis tools, as one of criminal law to explain the limits of proof, is unscientific. In essence, the possibility of prediction is only the principle basis and the theoretical support of the limit of criminal law interpretation. Criminal stereotype - the essence of things is the limit of criminal law interpretation, while the French semantic theory is the logic analysis tool of criminal law interpretation limit. Combined with the actual conditions in our country, crime stereotypes should be amended as follows: Criminous stereotypes are normative types and substantive judgments should be made, which are substantive types. To grasp the crime stereotypes, we should proceed from the nature of things to demonstrate. The investigation of the essence of things and the determination of the crime stereotype come from deducing the mode of deduction such as deduction and induction under the premise of the law meaning and the homogeneity of the meaning relation.