论文部分内容阅读
在构建有关“文革”的民族记忆之时,文学表现出足够坚韧持久的耐心与力量。2000年以来的“文革”叙事在延续“伤痕”、“反思”式的写作传统之时,又格外在思想写作(《启蒙时代》、《如焉@.sars.come》)、怪诞写作(《坚硬如水》、《兄弟》(上)、《后悔录》)与回忆抒情型写作(《致一九七五》、《一个人的微湖闸》)这三个方向上用力。就现有创作而言,这是三个值得重视的楔入“文革”的写作向度,分别指向了青年启蒙思想资源的分析、先锋精神的延续以及创作心态的变化。正是由于作家们在这三个方面的努力,“文革”叙事显示出其应该有的时间积淀与艰难突破。
In building the national memory of the Cultural Revolution, literature showed tenacious and enduring patience and strength. The “Cultural Revolution” narrative since the year 2000 has also been especially influential in ideological writing (“Enlightenment”, “Romance.”) As it continues the writing tradition of “Scar” and “ ), Grotesque writing (”hard water“, ”brother“ (on), ”regret recording“) and memorizing lyric writing (”one nine seven five“, ”a person’s micro-Lake brake“) in these three directions Forced. In terms of the existing works, this is the three important aspects of WAD writing, pointing to the analysis of the resource of youth enlightenment, the continuation of pioneer spirit and the change of creative attitude. It is precisely because of the efforts of writers in these three aspects, ”Cultural Revolution" narrative shows that it should have time to accumulate and difficult breakthroughs.