论文部分内容阅读
目前各国立法对于股权外部转让限制大多在同意权制度与优先购买权制度之间择一规定,而我国公司法和台湾地区公司法则是重复规定了两种制度,这样对于公司人合性的维护固然起到了很好的保护作用,但是对于转让股东的利益而言却是极大的不利。优先购买权制度对于对外转让限制过于宽松,并不能很好的维持公司的人合性而同意权制度对于剩余股东必须强制购买该股权而言又过于严苛,相对而言指定购买制度能够弥补一些同意权制度的严苛和优先购买权制度的过分自由。
At present, most of the legislation on foreign equity transfer restricts the choice between the consent system and the preemption system. Our company law and the company law in Taiwan repeatedly stipulate the two systems, Played a very good protective role, but for the benefit of the transfer of shareholders is a great disadvantage. The preemptive right system is too loose for the restrictions on foreign transfers and does not maintain the goodness of fit of the company well. The consent system is too harsh for the remaining shareholders to force the purchase of the shares. In contrast, the designated purchase system can make up for some The harsh system of consent and the over-freedom of the right of first refusal.