关于“歇家”问题,现已引起了国内外一些学者的关注,王致中、马明忠、李刚、徐继文、张世明、胡铁球、谷口规矩雄等已有一系列论文发表,对“歇家”的概念性质、“歇家”与洋行的关系、参与赋役领域及司法领域的原因和方式,以及歇家牙行的经营模式、“歇家”与“客店”“牙家”名称的关系等内容做了深入探讨。但研究中却均未采用《滨州革除歇家批头记》一文。《滨州革除歇家批头记》对明清之际的“歇家”、“批头”的记载具有非常珍贵的史料价值,为进一步认识“歇家”的性质提供了一些新线索,本文拟以此文为中心,并结合其他史料对“歇家”的性质及类型、“歇家”与“批头”之间的区别与联系等问题再作粗浅的探讨。 A number of scholars have already paid attention to the problem of “rest home”. A series of papers have been published on Wang Zhizhong, Ma Mingzhong, Li Gang, Xu Jicheng, Zhang Shiming, Hu Tieqiu, The nature of the concept, the relationship between the “break-up” and the foreign firms, the reasons and methods involved in the field of taxation and the administration of justice, and the business model of the corporation. Home “the name of the relationship made in-depth discussions. However, none of the studies used the article ”Binzhou Leather Except for Home Ownership Approval“. The account of Binzhou Gejiu Shichang has the precious historical value for the records of the Ming and Qing Dynasties, providing a Some new clues, this article intends to this article as the center, combined with other historical data on the ”nature“ and ”type“, ”“ and ”break the " For a superficial discussion.