王宰是武宗平定泽潞战役中的重要将领,然《旧唐书》未为其立传,《新唐书》虽有传,但失之过简,致其生平晦暗不明,而新近出版的《洛阳新获七朝墓志》所收王宰墓志则弥补了这一缺憾。然而比读墓志与传世文献,可以发现两者之间对同一事件记载的巨大差别。本文即通过对两者的比读,从个案研究的角度揭示了代表着私人立场的墓志文献中的虚美与隐恶,从而展示了不同史料的多元层次。 King slaughter was an important general in the battle of Wu Zongping at Dingzelu. However, although the Old Tang Book did not give an account of its origins, the New Tang book was passed down but lost its simplicity. The newly published “Luoyang won the epitaph of the seven dynasties,” the king received the slaughter of the king to make up for this shortcoming. However, compared with reading the epitaphs and handed down documents, we can find the huge difference recorded in the same event between the two. By comparing the two, this article reveals the imaginary beauty and cynicism in the epitaphs representing the private position from the perspective of case studies, thus demonstrating the multi-levels of different historical materials.