在常规的文学批评中，存在着同资本主义分配形式相似的隐匿生产过程的作用；文学文本不是被视为一种建构，而是当作文本所描述的社会的自然反映或作者主体性的自发流露，其结果便造成作者与读者连成一气的幻觉，从而导致了一种非生产性的文学批评。而新的、生产性的批评实践，它在文学作品中发现的是一种新的可理解的对象：它生产文本。文本是一个不确定的过程，它从单一、单义的阅读中挣脱，变成便于读者生产的、多义的、矛盾的、可改变的，而批评的任务则是确立文本中未说出的东西，并修正文本以生产真正的历史知识。批评不再是一种认识过程而是生产意义的工作，它不再寄生于既定的文本，而要建构自己的对象并生产作品；作者和读者不再表现为主体之间交流过程中对称的两端，而文本也只有从交流模式的僵化状态中解放出来，才能被有效地运用于阅读过程中的生产。 In conventional literary criticism, there exists the role of concealment of the production process similar to that of the distribution of capitalism; literary text is not seen as a construct, but as a natural reflection of the society as depicted in the text or spontaneously as the author’s subjectivity The result is an illusion of the author and the reader aloof, which leads to a non-productive literary criticism. The new, productive criticism that it finds in literature is a new, understandable object: it produces text. Text is an indefinite process that breaks away from being single and unimportant reading into a polysemous, contradictory and changeable product that is easy for the reader to produce. The task of criticism is to establish the unspoken Things, and correct the text to produce real historical knowledge. Criticism is no longer a cognitive process but a productive one. Instead of parasitizing established texts, criticism constructs its own objects and produces works. The author and reader no longer manifest themselves as two However, the text can be effectively used in the production of reading process only when it is liberated from the rigid state of the communication mode.