论文部分内容阅读
受近代西方市政理念影响,民国各大都市相继建设了一批平民住宅。但中央政府除一纸训令外无分文资金投入,在政治中心城市,政府投入平民住宅的资金具有偶发性,使住房救济缺乏持续性。汕头的案例说明在沿海商业城市,平民住宅建设是一项整合了政府、商人阶层和贫民群体三方共同利益的社会工程,虽然官商合作建设平民住宅取得一定成效,但政府与商人阶层利益的分化使这种模式也不能长久持续,因此政府必须真正承担住房救济的历史责任,那些所谓调动社会各阶层建设平民住宅积极性的计划和方案,并不能真正建立起实施住房救济的长效机制。
Affected by the modern Western concept of municipal administration, a number of civilian houses have been built in major cities in the Republic of China. However, the Central Government, with the exception of a piece of paper-based instruction, has no capital investment. In the political center of the city, government funds invested in civilian housing are sporadic and make housing relief lacks continuity. The case of Shantou shows that in coastal commercial cities, the construction of civilian housing is a social project that integrates the tri-tripartite interests of the government, the businesspeople and the poor. Although officials and businessmen have achieved some success in building civilians, the differentiation of the interests of the government and the businessmen Therefore, the government must truly shoulder the historical responsibility of housing relief. Those so-called plans and programs for mobilizing the enthusiasm of civilians in various social strata can not really establish a long-term mechanism for implementing housing remedies.