高中语文第二册《鸿门宴》一文中“距关,毋内诸侯”的“内”,课本注为:“内,同‘纳’,接纳。”我以为极不妥当,应予订正。理由是: 一、秦朝末年,各种反秦势力蜂起,且皆以“先破秦入咸阳”称王关中为目标,你争我斗,势不两立。因此,这里的“内”就是“内”,指函谷关内(西)。“毋内”就是“毋使内”,就是“毋使之内”,就是“先破秦入咸阳”的沛公“毋使诸侯进入函谷关内”。为什么这样讲呢?你攻我守,你来我打,如此而已。守之唯恐不固,打之唯恐不力,怎么能谈得上“接纳”呢?如果硬解成“接纳”,就把诸侯之间刀兵相见、你死我活的情势变为比较友好或至少是一般关系了。这既有悖历史事实,也破坏了本文所描写的刘项争斗的紧张气氛。 In the second book of the high school language “The Banquet of the Banquet”, the “inside” of “from the customs and the princes in the ancestral home”, the textbook notes: “Inner, same as ‘satisfaction”, accepted.” I think it is extremely inappropriate and should be revised. The reasons are as follows: 1. In the last years of the Qin Dynasty, all kinds of anti-Qin forces began to prosper, and all of them were “first break Qin into Xianyang,” and Wang Guanzhong was the target. Therefore, the “inner” here is “inside” and means the letter in the valley (in West). “Bai Nei” means “to make envy inside,” and “to make enlightenment within it,” that is to say, “Peng Gong, who breaks Qin into Xianyang first,” will allow the princes to enter the Hanuguan Pass. Why do you say this? You attack me, you come to me, so it is. If you hardly solve it as “accepted”, you will see the situation where the swordsmen meet each other and your life and death become more friendly or at least in general relations. . This has not only destroyed historical facts but also undermined the tense atmosphere of Liu Xiang’s struggle described in this article.