论文部分内容阅读
刑民交叉案件在司法实践中普遍存在,受“先刑后民”传统理念的影响,民事案件的处理长期受制于刑事案件,使权利人受损的利益无法获得及时的法律救济,引起当事人的不满。本文针对这一根本性问题,从现有法律规定及司法实践经验出发,提出对刑民交叉案件的处理原则,应以“刑民并行”为主,“先刑后民”、“先民后刑”为辅,并就如何协调处理刑民交叉案件的程序选择、程序衔接、实体衔接等一系列问题阐明了观点。
The cross-criminal cases are common in judicial practice. Influenced by the traditional concept of “first punishment after the punishment of civilians”, the handling of civil cases is subject to criminal cases for a long time, so that the interests of the obligee damaged can not be promptly remedied. Dissatisfaction of the parties. In view of this fundamental issue, from the existing legal provisions and judicatory practice experience, this article puts forward the principle of dealing with the cross-cutting cases of criminal and civilians. The principle of parallelism should be based on the combination of criminal and civil law, “Ancestors after the sentence ” as a supplement, and clarify the point of view on a series of issues on how to coordinate the handling of the cross-criminal case selection procedure, procedure convergence, entity convergence.