论文部分内容阅读
先秦文学研究中,大部分文学史以《诗经》、“历史散文”、“诸子散文”、《楚辞》为叙述框架。这种“囫囵研究法”未能体现出先秦文学发展的时间进程,导致了对先秦文学发展的认识不清晰,进而影响了对文体形成时代的判断。我们应该打破论辩文起于诸子的看法,追溯诸子各自的渊源,考察它以前有关思想家的论述,弄清先秦诸子发展的过程。同时,《左传》、《国语》等书也不能以“历史散文”笼统视之,其中包含着可独立成篇的文章,它们是编者依据有关文献,根据需要进行剪裁,但都应是来自原文,反映着原文的思想、结构以及语言的基本风格,可以作为独立的研究对象。董芬芬的《春秋辞令文体研究》正是依据《国语》、《左传》中具有文体意义的独立篇章,考察春秋时代的文体状况。
In the study of pre-Qin literature, most of the literary history takes “The Book of Songs”, “Historical Prose”, “The Prose of the Scholars”, “Chu Ci” as the narrative framework. This kind of “law of study” did not reflect the time course of the development of pre-Qin literature, which led to the lack of understanding of the development of pre-Qin literature, which in turn affected the judgment of the formation of style. We should break the argument that the arguments originated from the philosophers and trace the origins of the philosophers. We should examine the discussions of the philosophers before them and find out the process of their development. At the same time, books like “Zuo Zhuan” and “Gu Yu” can not be generalized by “Historical Prose.” They contain articles that can be made into articles independently. They are edited by the editors according to their needs and should be tailored, It is from the original text and reflects the original style, structure and basic style of language, and can serve as an independent research object. Dong Fenfen’s “Spring and Autumn Songs Style Research” is based on the independent text with stylistic significance in “Mandarin” and “Zuo Zhuan” to examine the style of the Spring and Autumn period.