从理论上讲,开放题因其内容的新颖性,形式的生动性,思维的发散性以及功能的创新性,给了学生以自己喜欢的方式尝试的机会,有利于创新思维的培养和实践能力的形成。然而,落实到实践层面,我们却很无奈地发现,学生开放的思考却常常遭遇封闭的评判,原本思路多元、着眼提升发展的开放探索异化成了“一锤定音”的终极裁决,或是沦为同一反复的喋喋不休。为此, In theory, the open questions give students the chance to try their own favorite way because of the novelty of content, the vividness of form, the divergence of thinking and the innovation of function, which is beneficial to the cultivation and practical ability of innovative thinking Formation. However, when it comes to practice, we find it very helpless to find that the students’ thinking on opening up often encounters closed judgments. Originally, the thinking is diversified and the opening-up exploration of altering development becomes the ultimate verdict of “final word” For the same repeated chatter. to this end,