周彦文同志《按劳分配的根据不是“劳动力个人所有制”》(以下简称《周文》)一文,读后不无启发,但该文断然否定劳动力个人所有制及其对按劳分配的决定作用,不敢苟同。这里提出自己不成熟的意见,以就教于周彦文同志和经济学界各位前辈。一《周文》认为,社会主义“公有制的基本内容,也是按劳分配的基础,”另一方面,“由于生产力水平还不高,”“存在旧式分工的差别,”产品不够丰富,还不具备按需分配的条件,“个人消费品必然要实行按劳分配。”因此,“阐述按劳分配的客观必然性,用不着去寻找另外的,并不存在的 Comrade Zhou Yawen’s article “distribution according to work is not based on” personal labor force “(hereinafter referred to as” Zhou Wen “), which was inspired by the article, but the article categorically denied the personal ownership of labor force and its role in determining the distribution according to work, not Dare to agree. I hereby put forward my own immature opinions so as to teach Comrades Zhou Yanwen and all the forerunners in the field of economics. One ”Zhou Wen“ thinks that ”the basic content of socialism“ of public ownership is also the basis of distribution according to work. ”On the other hand,“ because the level of productivity is not high, ”“ there is a difference in the old division of labor. ”The product is not rich enough and does not yet have According to the conditions of distribution on demand, “personal consumer goods must inevitably be distributed according to work.” Therefore, "the objective inevitability of distribution according to work is not required to search for another and does not exist