“解百纳”是否经张裕公司长期使用取得了商标的显著特征是整个谜团的核心。近日,被冠以中国葡萄酒业知识产权第一案的“解百纳”归属案,因为当事双方就“诉讼期间商标评审委员会的裁决是否生效”一事再起争执,张裕高举已遭起诉的商评委裁决书,要求各大商场超市将非张裕解百纳产品“下架”的做法再次引来行业集体抗议。 “Cabernet ” Whether Changyu acquired long-term use of the trademark’s salient features is the core of the whole puzzle. Recently, the case of “Cabernet” belonging to the first case of intellectual property rights of Chinese wine industry was rebuffed because of the dispute between the two parties regarding whether “the judgment of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board during the litigation came into effect” The prosecution of the TRAB award, requiring major shopping malls Supermarkets non-Changyu Cabernet products “off the shelf ” approach once again attracted industry collective protests.