论文部分内容阅读
校书之事,相互雠对而已,过去一直未知其难。今校《韩非子》,始知诚非易事。其难,不仅在学识之积累,实亦在于版本及有关资料之寻觅。若未见原本原书而草率从事,人云亦云,则难免以讹传讹,贻误后学。我校完《韩非子》,对此感触颇深。现不防稍举二三,以见校书之不易。《说疑》“为人主者”一句,顾广圻《韩非子识误》(以下简称《识误》)曰:“今本‘主’作‘臣’。按依上下文当作‘臣’。”顾氏所谓“今本”者,乃指吴郡赵用贤于明万历
The matter of school books, mutual confrontation only, the past has been unknown. Today school “Han Feizi”, the first known sincere is not easy. Its difficult, not only in the accumulation of knowledge, the fact is that the version and the relevant information to find. If you do not see the original book and sloppy, parroting, it is inevitable that the baseless assertion, delaying the study. My school finished “Han Fei child”, deep feeling. Is not anti-abbreviated 23, to see the school book is not easy. “Said suspicion” “as the masters ” one sentence, Gu Guangtao “Han Fei Zi Zhishi mistakes” (hereinafter referred to as “knowledge error”) said: “The present this as the main ’minister’. ”Gu’s so-called “ this this ”, refers to Wu Jun Zhao Xiaoxian Ming Wanli