论文部分内容阅读
我院于1978年7月至1979年10月共收治临床诊断为伤寒、副伤寒的患者200余例,对其中61例经细菌学证实者作了肥达氏反应的观察,同时随机选择非伤寒性发热及无发热人群,作为双盲试验的对照.现将观察情况报告如下。材料和方法一、实验分组:共分三组。1.伤寒组(A 组):61例。男35例,女26例.其中伤寒58例,副伤寒乙1例,副伤寒丙2例。全部病例除有临床症状、体征外,均在病程2～28天中找到病原菌。2.非伤寒发热组(B 组):31例.男17例,女
Our hospital from July 1978 to October 1979 were admitted to the clinical diagnosis of typhoid, paratyphus in patients with more than 200 cases, of which 61 cases were confirmed by bacteriological observation of Wadal’s reaction, while a random selection of non-typhoid fever Fever and fever-free population, as a double-blind trial of control now observe the report as follows. Materials and methods First, the experimental grouping: divided into three groups. 1. Typhoid group (A group): 61 cases. There were 35 males and 26 females, including 58 cases of typhoid fever, 1 case of paratyphoid fever and 2 cases of paratyphoid fever. In addition to all the cases of clinical symptoms, signs, are in the course of 2 to 28 days to find pathogens. Non-typhoid fever group (group B): 31 cases, 17 males and females