论文部分内容阅读
南阳、襄樊因《隆中对》再起争端新闻背景《隆中对》,一篇节选于《三国志·蜀志·诸葛亮传》的三百余字短文,曾入选人民教育出版社所编初三课本,1988年后淡出,2001年经审查通过复又入选2003年春开始使用的初中教材。7月18日,湖北襄樊某报载《<隆中对>“复出”的背后》,披露襄樊市为了使《隆中对》重返中学课本所做的种种工作。7月31日,河南南阳媒体原文转载此文,在南阳各界引起强烈反响。8月16日起,南阳市举行了“捍卫历史,尊重史实,诸葛亮南阳躬耕地万人签名活动。”与《隆中对》入选同一课本的还有诸葛亮的《出师表》。该文中的“南阳”在课本中被注释为“囊阳一带”。此解同样在南阳引起大哗。上述纷争的背景是诸葛亮躬耕地到底位于河南南阳还是湖北襄樊的史实之争,引发的思考却是:教科书是否能够并且应该承载带动地方经济发展的重任?教科书是否可以给有争议的史实变通地下结论?8月22日至26日,记者赴河南南阳和湖北襄樊两地进行调查。
Nanyang, Xiangfan, “Longzhong to” renewed the dispute news background “Longzhong right”, an excerpt from the “Three Kingdoms Zhushi Zhuge Liang Biography” more than 300 words essay, has been selected by the People’s Education Press, the first three textbooks, Faded out after 1988, passed the review in 2001, and re-enrolled in the spring of 2003 began to use junior high school textbooks. On July 18, a newspaper in Xiangfan, Hubei Province, reported “behind Longzhong” and “comeback”, disclosing various work done by Xiangfan City so that “Longzhong” could return to middle school textbooks. July 31, Henan Nanyang media original reproduced this article, aroused strong repercussions in various sectors of Nanyang. On August 16, Nanyang held a “Outstanding Teacher’s Guide” to defend the history, respect historical facts, and Zhuge Liang’s Nanshan Gongcun land of 10,000 signatures. The text of “Nanyang ” in the textbook was annotated as “capsule Yang area ”. This solution also caused a big splash in Nanyang. Whether the textbook can and should carry the important task of boosting local economic development? Can textbooks give incontrovertible conclusions about the underground history? Whether the textbook can and should carry the heavy responsibility of promoting local economic development? August 22 to 26, the reporter went to Henan Nanyang and Xiangfan in Hubei to conduct investigations.