论文部分内容阅读
目的观察不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘的临床效果。方法将92例小儿哮喘患儿随机分为观察组和对照组各46例,观察组采用空气压缩泵式雾化吸入治疗,对照组采取超声雾化吸入治疗,对2组临床疗效、治疗前后相关临床指标变化情况及不良反应发生情况进行对比评价。结果观察组治疗总有效率为93.48%高于对照组的76.09%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,2组患儿在动脉血氧分压(Pa O2)与用力肺活量(FVC)方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,2组上述两项指标均有所改善,且观察组改善效果显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论空气压缩泵式雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘效果显著优于超声雾化吸入治疗,值得采纳及应用。
Objective To observe the clinical effects of different inhalation methods on children asthma. Methods Ninety-two children with asthma were randomly divided into observation group (46 cases) and control group (46 cases). The observation group was treated by air compression pump atomization inhalation. The control group was treated by ultrasonic atomization inhalation. The clinical efficacy, Clinical indicators of changes and the occurrence of adverse reactions were evaluated. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.48%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (76.09%) (P <0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in PaO2 and FVC between the two groups (P> 0.05). After treatment, the above two indexes improved in both groups Observation group improved significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compressed air pump inhalation therapy for children with asthma significantly better than the effect of ultrasonic inhalation therapy, it is worth to adopt and application.