论文部分内容阅读
一、案情及处理经过1997年9月27日,某外贸公司向我分行交来信用证项下单据一套,金额为USD××,×××00,开证行为香港中行。我行验单后认为单证相符,当天寄单开证行。10月1日,开证行提出以下不符点拒付:B/L showing port of discharqe as“Hong Kong”instead of“Genova”(提单显示卸货港为香港代替了热那亚。)经核查,确认信用证要求海洋运输提单允许转船,航线为“from Dalian toGenova(从大连到热那亚)”。提单“port
First, the case and handling After September 27, 1997, a foreign trade company to my branch to pay a letter of credit a set of the amount of USD × ×, ××× 00, issuing Bank of Hong Kong. I think the line after the inspection documents, the same day, send a single issuing bank. On October 1, the issuing bank made the following nonconformity protest: ”B / L showing port of discharqe as“ ”Hong Kong“ instead of ”Genova“ (The bill of lading shows that the port of discharge was Hong Kong replacing Genoa.) Upon verification , Confirmed that the letter of credit required ocean transport bills of lading to allow transshipment, the route is ”from Dalian toGenova (from Dalian to Genoa) “. Bill of lading ”port