论文部分内容阅读
伴随着相对独立量刑程序的逐步形成和确立,对于量刑程序的研究也摆在了理论界和司法实践界的面前。如何在一次庭审活动中正确地界分定罪和量刑两个程序,让量刑程序能够真正发挥其作用,达到定罪和量刑程序的并重,不仅需要理论的支撑更需要司法的探索,而这其中证据规则尤为重要。在量刑程序中,量刑证据具有区别于定罪证据的特殊性,其举证责任和证明标准也当然地发生变化。量刑证据规则的确立不是打破既有规则的重构,而是对定罪证据规则的必要补充和修正。
With the gradual formation and establishment of a relatively independent sentencing procedure, the study of the sentencing procedure is also placed in front of the theoretical circles and judicial practice circles. How to correctly demarcate the two procedures of conviction and sentencing in a trial so that the sentencing procedure can really play its role and achieve the equal emphasis on conviction and sentencing procedures requires not only theoretical support but also judicial exploration, important. In the process of sentencing, the sentencing evidence differs from the particularity of evidence of conviction, and the burden of proof and the standard of proof also change naturally. The establishment of sentencing evidence rules is not to break the reconstruction of the existing rules but to supplement and amend the rules of conviction evidence.