论文部分内容阅读
阐明权是市场经济条件下民事诉讼的一项重要法律制度,而阐明权的行使问题更是诉讼中活的机制和力量。随着我国民事诉讼审判方式改革的推行和民事诉讼理论的发展,主张我国民事诉讼应当由职权主义转向当事人主义成为理论和实践的主流,阐明权制度的有关理论及其行使所针对的诉讼事项的范围问题确需给予更多的关注。本文对法官阐明的理念及阐明权制度的确立过程作了回顾,概括总结了我国关于阐明权的规定和制度运行现状,最后针对我国国情提出法官行使阐明权应适用的具体诉讼事项,并从相反情形划出阐明权应当避免涉足的范围。
The right to clarify is an important legal system of civil litigation under the condition of market economy, and the issue of exercising the right to clarify is even more the mechanism and force of livelihood in litigation. With the implementation of the civil trial reform in our country and the development of the theory of civil litigation, it is argued that the civil litigation in our country should become the mainstream of theory and practice from the power of authority to the adolescents’ doctrine, clarifying the relevant theories of the power system and the litigation matters The scope issue really needs more attention. This paper reviews the concept of the judge and the establishment of the system of clarification, summarizes the provisions of our country on the clarification of power and the status quo of the system operation, and finally puts forward the specific litigation matters that judges should exercise the right of clarification according to our national conditions. The situation should be formulated to clarify the scope of the right should be avoided.