论文部分内容阅读
实践存在论美学提出后,在学术界引起了广泛的争论。参与者的多样性和指导思想的复杂性是这场论争的典型特征:以极“左”思潮基础的政治化批评和以解构主义代表的后现代思潮逐渐渗透到论争者的思维机制中,演变为对实践存在论美学进行批评和评判的思维模式和价值标准。总体上看,这两种批评均缺乏实事求是、开放创新、科学严谨和相互尊重的学术精神,均不利于传承中国当代美学60多年来的学术积累。对这场论争进行仔细考察,对于认识如何建设有中国特色的美学理论,如何在学术争鸣中“还马克思以学”以及如何重建学术批判的建设性价值维度等问题,具有重要的学术参考价值。
After the existential aesthetics was put forward, there has been widespread controversy in academia. The diversity of participants and the complexity of guiding ideology are typical features of this debate: politicized criticism based on the ideological trend of “Leftist” and the postmodernism ideology represented by deconstruction gradually permeate into the thinking mechanism of the contenders , Evolved into a thinking mode and value standard for criticizing and judging practical ontological aesthetics. Generally speaking, neither of these critiques lacks the academic spirit of seeking truth from facts, opening up and innovation, rigor of science, and mutual respect, which are not conducive to inheriting the academic accumulation of contemporary Chinese aesthetics for more than 60 years. The careful examination of this debate has important academic reference for understanding how to build aesthetics theory with Chinese characteristics, how to reconcile the constructive values of academic criticism in academic contests, and so on. value.