论文部分内容阅读
(二)通过国内法律程序的救济(track Ⅰ) 过去总协定的缔约方主要是通过国内的反补贴法来对外国的国内补贴,特别是出口补贴来取得救济。新的守则仍保持了这一救济渠道,但要求各成员方在调查、处理和征收反补贴税时必须严格按乌拉圭回合的补贴与反补贴守则和农产品协定的各项规定来办。 正如前面已提及的,尽管一个成员方可同时通过两个渠道寻求救济,但最终的救济措施只能有一个,即或通过总协定采取反措施,或通过国内法,以加征反补贴税的方式来取得救济。但二者不可兼得。
(B) Remedies for the adoption of domestic legal procedures (track I) The parties to the general agreement in the past have mainly used domestic countervailing laws to obtain relief from foreign domestic subsidies, especially export subsidies. The new code still maintains this channel of relief. However, all member states must strictly follow the Uruguay Round’s subsidy and countervailing codes and the provisions of the agricultural agreement when investigating, processing, and collecting countervailing duties. As already mentioned, although a member can seek relief through both channels at the same time, there can only be one final remedy, namely, adopting countermeasures through general agreement or adopting domestic laws to impose countervailing duties. The way to get relief. But the two can not have both.