刘涛此人,其生也晚。他若生在晚清,必是康梁门下,做一番维新保皇的大事。再往前生两千年,生在汉代,他便是个经生,那就除了毛诗还有刘诗,或者《春秋》另出一部刘传。我的意思是,刘涛的禀赋、根底、品性,其实都更近于古。如此一个古人生在20世纪80年代,到如今又做当代文学的批评,这是一件有意思的事。认识刘涛,算来已有八年。他的文章其实并不曾多看,只看这个人,觉得端端正正正。没有飞扬浮躁, Liu Tao, his life, too late. If he was born in the late Qing Dynasty, he must be under Kang Liangmen and do some great rejuvenation. Two thousand years ago and then students born in the Han Dynasty, he is a student, then apart from the poems there are poems Liu, or “Spring and Autumn” Another Liu Chuan. My point is, Liu Tao’s endowment, foundation, character, are actually closer to the ancient. It is an interesting thing that an ancients life was criticized in contemporary literature in the 1980s. Know Liu Tao, counting for eight years. In fact, his article did not look much, just look at this person, that the end is positive. Did not fly impetuous,