论文部分内容阅读
早期的法则区别理论为国际私法确立了主权权力的研究范式。但这种将国际私法公法化、政治化的研究范式已经被历史抛弃。19世纪萨维尼的法律关系研究范式将国际私法拉回到私法的轨道,但其对“本座”所在地的排他优待以及对主权利益的特例性安排也不符合现代国家对跨国私人交往进行平等调整和干预的需要。20世纪以来,美国的冲突法革命并没有为合理确定主权因素在国际私法中的适当位置作出实质性的突破,欧洲国际私法的欧盟化虽然是一个重大的变化,但也仅具有区域性的解释力,且并未动摇国际社会层面国际私法的萨维尼范式。在主权分立、法律体系并存的国际环境下,应当对传统的法律关系范式进行完善,确立“私人权利—主权权力”的主辅型研究范式。
The earlier theory of difference of laws established the paradigm of sovereignty for Private International Law. However, this research paradigm of publicizing and politicizing private international law has been abandoned by history. In the 19th century, Savigny’s paradigm of legal relations pulled the private international law back to the private law track, but his exclusive treatment of the seat of his seat and the special arrangement of the sovereign interest did not accord with the modern state’s conduct of transnational private contacts Equal adjustment and intervention needs. Since the 20th century, the conflict of laws in the United States has not made a substantive breakthrough in determining the proper position of sovereignty in the private international law. Although the European Union’s private international law is a major change, it only has a regional interpretation Without compromising the Savigny paradigm of private international law at the international level. In the international environment in which the sovereignty is divided and the legal system coexist, the traditional paradigm of legal relations should be perfected and the main and auxiliary research paradigms of “private rights - sovereign power” should be established.