瓦雷里一生中诗的产量并不高,但他写了大量的随笔,其中不少涉及到诗歌创作。他提出的纯诗的观点,在当时曾引起争论,现在,这些已成为象征主义诗歌的重要文献。了解他的纯诗观,对于理解象征派诗歌,特别对于理解瓦雷里的诗歌,很有益处。纯诗的提出带有偶然性。有一次瓦雷里为朋友的诗集写序,在里面提到了这个词。这种提法引出一些争议,于是,瓦雷里在一次演讲中,特地就此做了一番解释。瓦雷里认为,每当话词中表现出偏离最直接的,即最不可感的思想表达的言词时,我们就会揣测出一个与纯粹的实际世界不同的关系世界;当我们设想去扩大这个特殊领域时,就会感到一个生动优美的实体的某个部分。对这个实体进行完善,加以精制和利用,就会成为艺术作品的诗。瓦雷里进一步提出:是否可以用那些与上 Varery’s poem production in his life is not high, but he wrote a lot of essays, many of them involved in poetry. His views on pure poetry were controversial at the time, and now they have become important documents of symbolism poetry. Understanding his pure poetry is good for understanding the poetry of the symbolism and especially for understanding Valery’s poetry. Pure poems come with chance. Once, Valery wrote a poem for a friend and mentioned the word in it. This formulation leads to some controversy, so Valery made a special explanation in a speech. Vareley argues that each time the discourse shows a departure from the most immediate, or most insignificant, expression of thought, we will speculate on a world of relations different from purely physical worlds; as we envision to expand this A special area, you will feel a vivid beautiful part of the entity. Perfection, refinement and utilization of this entity will make it a poem of works of art. Valery further put forward: whether it can be used with those on