无论在司法实践或行政法学理论界，行政指导的救济问题一直无法解决，原因在于将行政指导从本质上认为是一种非强制手段，不具权力性，不直接涉及相对方的权利义务，在行政机关与相对方之间不产生法律关系，不受司法审查，只受上级机关的监督。这样就导致相对方因接受行政指导? Whether in the judicial practice or the field of administrative jurisprudence, the remedy of administrative guidance has not been solved because the administrative guidance is essentially considered as a non-mandatory means, not of power and does not directly involve the rights and obligations of the other side. There is no legal relationship between the authority and the other counterparty, no judicial review, and only supervisory authority. This led to the opposite party due to receive administrative guidance?