论文部分内容阅读
导致近代中国两派社会学者分歧的主要原因是其理论的指导思想——唯物史观和折中论的本质差别。以唯物史观为依据,马克思主义社会学者强调只有通过革命打破旧制度才能建立民主政治。改良派社会学者在折中论的指导下,表现出多元化和调和论的倾向,主张融合各种社会进步因素,改良资本主义制度的弊端。在民主制度建设中,改良派社会学者逐渐倾向于中间道路,马克思主义社会学者结合中国实际诠释了社会主义民主的含义,建立了人民民主国家。
The main reason leading to the disagreement between the social scholars of the two schools in modern China is the theoretical guiding ideology - the essential difference between historical materialism and compromise theory. Based on the historical materialism, Marxist sociologists emphasize that democratic politics can only be established through breaking the old system through revolution. Under the guidance of eclecticism, the reformist sociologists have shown the tendency of pluralism and reconciliation, advocating the merging of various social progress factors and the improvement of the capitalist system. In the construction of democracy, the reformist social scholars gradually tend to the middle road. Marxist sociologists have interpreted the meaning of socialist democracy in light of China’s reality and established a people’s democracy.