论文部分内容阅读
本文认为可以采用数理经济学方法批判新自由主义观点,并且对国有企业效率评价做出理论检视。国有企业性质决定了它既具有微观目标又具有超微观目标。其中超微观目标体现本质特征,它具有多样性和时变性。新自由主义经济学家无视超微观目标的价值,给出了国有企业微观低效论和国有企业宏观无用论等错误结论。在资本市场与劳动市场上,国有企业与非国有企业各有其非对称优势。新自由主义经济学家对国有企业进行效率评价时,强调一个方面而忽视另一个方面,给出了具有欺骗性的结论。企业在行业中的地位对微观效率的影响有时具有多样性,新自由主义经济学家的垄断效率论既不科学,又欠公允。
This paper argues that mathematical economics can be used to criticize neo-liberal views, and to conduct a theoretical review of the efficiency evaluation of state-owned enterprises. The nature of state-owned enterprises determines that it has both micro-goals and ultra-micro-goals. Among them, the ultramicroscopic target embodies the essential characteristics, which has diversity and time-varying. Neoliberal economists ignore the value of the goal of the micro-micro, giving the wrong conclusions of the micro-inefficient state-owned enterprises and the state-owned enterprises macro-useless theory. In the capital market and the labor market, state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises each have their own asymmetrical advantages. When neoliberal economists evaluate the efficiency of state-owned enterprises, they emphasize one aspect and ignore the other, giving deceptive conclusions. The influence of the firm’s position in the industry on micro-efficiency is sometimes diversified. Neo-liberal economists’ monopoly efficiency theory is neither scientific nor fair.