本刊四卷一期发表的「老工人郭福山」是一篇有严重错误的作品,过去曾经受到严正的批评,在今年二月号本刊发表的「文艺整风学习和我们的编辑工作」一文里,也曾经提到过这篇文章,并对编辑部的错误作过一些检讨。现在发表的丁克辛同志的这篇检讨,虽然对问题的分析还不够深刻,但他诚恳的暴露自己在文艺工作中的错误事实,并加以批判,这是应该欢迎的。希望丁克辛同志更深刻的分析批判自己的思想,并在实际工作中加以改正。 Guo Kui-shan, the veteran worker published in the first issue of the four volumes of this journal, is a serious and erroneous piece of work that has been severely criticized in the past. In his February February issue of this publication, "Literary Rectification Study and Our Editors’ Also mentioned this article, and made some review of the editorial department’s mistakes. The review now being published by Comrade Ding Xinsin, although the analysis of the issue is not yet profound enough, but he should sincerely expose and criticize the erroneous facts he has made in literary and art work. We hope Comrade Ding Xixin can analyze and criticize his own thinking in a profound way and correct it in his practical work.