论文部分内容阅读
通过《穀梁传》十五则叙事文字与《左传》、《公羊传》同题故事逐一比较可以发现,有穀梁氏优于左氏、公羊氏者,有三家各有千秋者,有穀梁氏不如二氏者。穀梁氏多数故事不如左氏,少数互有短长。穀梁氏叙事与公羊氏相差无几。出现上述差异的原因在于,穀梁氏、公羊氏是经学家,重在解释《春秋》经义,故事只是为释义的补充而已,因而忽视叙事的完整性和生动性。左氏是史学家兼史传文学家,长于叙事,重视细节的真实性和情节的完整性,解释《春秋》经义只是偶尔为之。
By comparing the fifteen narrative texts of “Gu Liang Biography” with the stories of “Zuo Zhuan” and “Gong Yang Zhuan” one by one, we can find that Gu Liang is superior to Zuo and Gong She, Gu Liang less than two Liang. Gu Liang majority of stories as Zuo, a few short and long each other. Valley Liang’s narrative and Ram’s almost the same. The reasons for the above differences lie in that Gu Liang and Ram are scholar who mainly interprets the “Spring and Autumn” Jingyi. The story is merely a supplement to the explanation, so ignoring the completeness and vividness of the narrative. Zuo Shi is a historian and historian of literature, narrative, emphasis on the authenticity of the details and the integrity of the plot, explain the “Spring and Autumn” Jing Yi only occasionally.