论文部分内容阅读
法律发展概念不等同于法制现代化理论。法制现代化理论因为强调“传统”的后发展国家的落后与“现代”的发达国家的先进而带有强烈的西方中心主义色彩,而法律发展概念强调的是法律发展主体的自主性与独立性的同时,又注重各主体间的交流性,因而其内涵显得更为丰富。当今中国对于法律发展的研究理论在努力摆脱“西方中心主义”影响下,呈现出三种具有代表性的范式:以梁治平为代表的“文化论”、以朱苏力为代表的“本土资源论”以及以葛洪义为代表的“现代化范式”三种范式。
The concept of legal development is not the same as the theory of legal modernization. The theory of legal modernization emphasizes the backwardness of the “traditional” post-development countries and the strong western-centrism of the advanced countries in “Modern ”. The concept of legal development emphasizes the autonomy of the subjects of legal development At the same time with independence, but also pay attention to the communication between the main body, so its content is more abundant. Under the influence of “western centralism ”, the research on legal development in China today presents three representative paradigms: “Cultural Theory ” represented by Liang Zhiping “Local Resources Theory” and Ge Hongyi as the representative of the “modern paradigm” three paradigms.