论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】非法证据排除申请原则上应当在一审程序中提出,但辩方在一审结束后才发现相关线索或者材料,或确有正当理由无法在一审中提出而在二审期间提出的,法院应予审查。检察机关承担取证合法性的证明责任并承担举证不力的不利后果,检察机关未提供充分证据证明取证合法性的被告人庭前供述应当依法排除,检察机关不能提供证据排除被告人庭前受胁迫的可能,从而证明被告人供述自愿性的庭审供述,亦不能作为定案依据。
The main purpose of the referee The application for the exclusion of illegal evidence should in principle be made in the first instance procedure. However, if the defense only found the relevant clues or materials after the first instance or did not justify the first instance and filed the second instance, the court should To review. Prosecutors assume the burden of proof of the legitimacy of forensics and bear unfavorable evidence of the adverse consequences of the prosecution did not provide sufficient evidence to prove the legitimacy of the accused in court pre-trial confession should be excluded according to law, prosecutors can not provide evidence to exclude the defendant in court before coercion Probably, this proves that the accused’s confession made a voluntary trial statement and can not be used as a basis for the verdict.